← Back to PRs

#21829: Update update_clawdbot.md with development note

by yasir-shahhhhh open 2026-02-20 12:37 View on GitHub →
size: XS
Added note about ongoing development and upcoming features. ## Summary Describe the problem and fix in 2–5 bullets: - Problem: - Why it matters: - What changed: - What did NOT change (scope boundary): ## Change Type (select all) - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Docs - [ ] Security hardening - [ ] Chore/infra ## Scope (select all touched areas) - [ ] Gateway / orchestration - [ ] Skills / tool execution - [ ] Auth / tokens - [ ] Memory / storage - [ ] Integrations - [ ] API / contracts - [ ] UI / DX - [ ] CI/CD / infra ## Linked Issue/PR - Closes # - Related # ## User-visible / Behavior Changes List user-visible changes (including defaults/config). If none, write `None`. ## Security Impact (required) - New permissions/capabilities? (`Yes/No`) - Secrets/tokens handling changed? (`Yes/No`) - New/changed network calls? (`Yes/No`) - Command/tool execution surface changed? (`Yes/No`) - Data access scope changed? (`Yes/No`) - If any `Yes`, explain risk + mitigation: ## Repro + Verification ### Environment - OS: - Runtime/container: - Model/provider: - Integration/channel (if any): - Relevant config (redacted): ### Steps 1. 2. 3. ### Expected - ### Actual - ## Evidence Attach at least one: - [ ] Failing test/log before + passing after - [ ] Trace/log snippets - [ ] Screenshot/recording - [ ] Perf numbers (if relevant) ## Human Verification (required) What you personally verified (not just CI), and how: - Verified scenarios: - Edge cases checked: - What you did **not** verify: ## Compatibility / Migration - Backward compatible? (`Yes/No`) - Config/env changes? (`Yes/No`) - Migration needed? (`Yes/No`) - If yes, exact upgrade steps: ## Failure Recovery (if this breaks) - How to disable/revert this change quickly: - Files/config to restore: - Known bad symptoms reviewers should watch for: ## Risks and Mitigations List only real risks for this PR. Add/remove entries as needed. If none, write `None`. - Risk: - Mitigation: <!-- greptile_comment --> <h3>Greptile Summary</h3> This PR adds a development note to the Clawdbot workflow documentation. The added content contains spelling errors (`comming` → `coming`, `upcomming` → `upcoming`) and excessive whitespace (7 blank lines). The note itself is vague and doesn't provide actionable information for users following this highly technical workflow document. Previous review comments flagged these same issues, but they remain unaddressed in the current version. <h3>Confidence Score: 4/5</h3> - This PR is safe to merge as it only adds documentation content with no functional code changes - Score reflects that while the changes are non-functional and pose no technical risk, the PR has quality issues (spelling errors, excessive whitespace, vague content) that were previously flagged but not addressed. The documentation addition doesn't provide clear value to users of this technical workflow. - `.agent/workflows/update_clawdbot.md` needs attention for spelling corrections and formatting cleanup <sub>Last reviewed commit: b1da7dd</sub> <!-- greptile_other_comments_section --> <!-- /greptile_comment -->

Most Similar PRs