← Back to PRs

#20965: feat: Add comprehensive model configuration and discovery for various…

by rodeok open 2026-02-19 14:04 View on GitHub →
agents size: S
… AI providers, including Groq. ## Summary Describe the problem and fix in 2–5 bullets: - Problem: - Why it matters: - What changed: - What did NOT change (scope boundary): ## Change Type (select all) - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Refactor - [ ] Docs - [ ] Security hardening - [ ] Chore/infra ## Scope (select all touched areas) - [ ] Gateway / orchestration - [ ] Skills / tool execution - [ ] Auth / tokens - [ ] Memory / storage - [ ] Integrations - [ ] API / contracts - [ ] UI / DX - [ ] CI/CD / infra ## Linked Issue/PR - Closes # - Related # ## User-visible / Behavior Changes List user-visible changes (including defaults/config). If none, write `None`. ## Security Impact (required) - New permissions/capabilities? (`Yes/No`) - Secrets/tokens handling changed? (`Yes/No`) - New/changed network calls? (`Yes/No`) - Command/tool execution surface changed? (`Yes/No`) - Data access scope changed? (`Yes/No`) - If any `Yes`, explain risk + mitigation: ## Repro + Verification ### Environment - OS: - Runtime/container: - Model/provider: - Integration/channel (if any): - Relevant config (redacted): ### Steps 1. 2. 3. ### Expected - ### Actual - ## Evidence Attach at least one: - [ ] Failing test/log before + passing after - [ ] Trace/log snippets - [ ] Screenshot/recording - [ ] Perf numbers (if relevant) ## Human Verification (required) What you personally verified (not just CI), and how: - Verified scenarios: - Edge cases checked: - What you did **not** verify: ## Compatibility / Migration - Backward compatible? (`Yes/No`) - Config/env changes? (`Yes/No`) - Migration needed? (`Yes/No`) - If yes, exact upgrade steps: ## Failure Recovery (if this breaks) - How to disable/revert this change quickly: - Files/config to restore: - Known bad symptoms reviewers should watch for: ## Risks and Mitigations List only real risks for this PR. Add/remove entries as needed. If none, write `None`. - Risk: - Mitigation: <!-- greptile_comment --> <h3>Greptile Summary</h3> Added Groq provider support with model catalog including Llama 3.1 (405B, 70B, 8B), Mixtral 8x7B, and Gemma 2 9B models. The implementation follows established patterns from other providers (Together, Huggingface) by creating a model catalog, builder functions, and integrating into the implicit provider resolution system. Authentication uses standard `GROQ_API_KEY` environment variable and profile-based credentials. <h3>Confidence Score: 5/5</h3> - This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk - The implementation follows established patterns from existing providers (Together, Huggingface, Nvidia, Qianfan). The code is straightforward - adds a new model catalog file with standard model definitions and integrates Groq into the provider resolution system using the same authentication flow as other providers. No breaking changes, no security concerns, and Groq was already referenced in documentation and media understanding providers. - No files require special attention <sub>Last reviewed commit: e363f90</sub> <!-- greptile_other_comments_section --> <sub>(2/5) Greptile learns from your feedback when you react with thumbs up/down!</sub> <!-- /greptile_comment -->

Most Similar PRs